Latest Headlines
2

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels was Probably Mellower when He Sold Drugs

Now this? This is something I did not know (h/t Atrios):

Perhaps the most pivotal day of Daniels’ four years at Princeton was May 14, 1970 — the day of the drug arrest that Daniels thought would sully his political future. Officers found enough marijuana in his room to fill two size 12 shoe boxes, reports of the incident say. He and the other inhabitants of the room were also charged with possession of LSD and prescription drugs without a prescription. Daniels and his two roommates in 111 Cuyler Hall, Marc Stuart ’71 and Richard Stockton ’71, were arrested and, after plea bargaining, Daniels eventually escaped with a $350 fine for “maintaining a common nuisance.”

Two size 12 shoe boxes stuffed with reefer is a lot of fucking reefer. At least a half pound, maybe more. Under current Indiana drug laws, if Daniels were found to be in possession of that much reefer he would be charged with a Class D felony and face a prison sentence of anywhere from six months to three years. And this is being rather generous for a couple of reasons! For one, it discounts all of the acid and pills he and his bros were dropping all the time during their tenure at Princeton. For another, I’m assuming that being caught with the drugs on a college campus would not constitute being within 1000 feet of a school, which would otherwise push it up to a Class C felony (jail time: four to eight years). Though I very well could be wrong!

Here’s what Daniels told the Daily Princetonian on Monday about his arrest forty years ago:

Read the rest of this entry »

0

Today I Saw Stanley Kubrick’s First Film, and You Can Too!

Prodigy.com:

In 1951, at 23 years of age, Kubrick used $3,900 of his savings to finance his first film, a short documentary about middleweight boxer Walter Cartier, who had been the subject of one of Kubrick’s Look photo assignments titled “Prizefighter Walter Cartier.”

Taught to use the equipment by the man who rented it to him, Kubrick acted as producer, director, and cinematographer. Day of the Fight was bought by RKO for its This is America series for about $100 less than it cost Kubrick to make and played at the Paramount Theatre in New York.

Thanks Mefi!

1

WELCOME TO ‘TAMPON FRIENDS’!

Based on a True Story!

Tampon Friends will be back next week!  In the meantime, make a sock puppet, and if you get lonely, you can find Celeste on the internets here.

2

Winter’s Bone Will Get Robbed at the Oscars

We know what’s going to happen. The Oscar is going to go to Natalie Portman. She has it sewn up, even after appearing in every bad movie this winter, one of which was with Ashton Kutcher. And while Black Swan was a pretty nifty movie with some dazzling performances, costumes, and visual effects, not to mention some of the creepiest locations I’ve ever seen (I’m scared of all theatre basements, but the basement at Lincoln Center seems especially terrifying), it was nowhere near as good as Winter’s Bone. Jennifer Lawrence has been nominated for the Best Actress Oscar for her turn as seventeen-year-old badass Ree Dolly, but she won’t win it. And this would outrage me — if I actually thought that Oscars go to those who deserve them.

The story is both epic and intimate, a classic film noir detective story and a quietly disturbing family drama. Ree is a teenager in the Ozarks, looking after her younger siblings and her mentally unstable mother while her father is off cooking meth and jumping bail. When the bondsman comes to take their land, Ree is given a week to find him. As she hunts down her old man, she encounters some incredibly terrifying folks in the criminal underworld and tries to convince her uncle, the equally fearsome Teardrop Dolly, to help her out. The story proceeds in noir-ish fashion until the gut-wrenching conclusion that finds Ree in a rowboat with the two scariest looking women in all of Missouri. I don’t want to say any more. You simply have to see it, but fair warning: you will feel slightly haunted when it’s all over.

Ree Dolly is unlike any character I have ever seen depicted in film. She’s an Ozarkian samurai — relentless, indomitable, stoic. Every part of this movie will stay with you long after the credits roll, but Ree will stick with you for weeks, like a feverish chill that you can’t shake. There is something in her eyes that is just devastating; Jennifer Lawrence truly gave the performance of a lifetime.

Winter’s Bone is damn near flawless: beautifully shot, well-written, and anchored by Lawrence’s unflinching portrayal of Ree. Director Debra Granik and cinematographer Michael McDonough have even managed to make the region itself into a character: cold, hard, dark, and foreboding, which adds such great depth to the film. This film is a testimony of how impoverished regions like the Ozarks are particularly brutal on women. The movie is nominated for four Oscars, including Best Picture; unfortunately, it probably won’t win any of them. It’s also a shame that Granik wasn’t nominated for Best Director. Nonetheless, I find it rather awesome that Winter’s Bone was written, directed, and produced by an all-female team. As Loretta Lynn could probably tell you, a woman has a special insight into how it feels to chase down a no-good man, and the kind of guts and resolve required to do so. I wish women filmmakers like Granik made more movies like Winter’s Bone, and that the Academy would start to recognize them.

***

Update (from Ben): Check out this really neat documentary on the lives and self-identities of many of the native Ozarkians cast in the film (it’s a free iTunes download).

0

“Do You Want to Have Sex?” is not a Good Pick-up Line

Steven Pinker explains the dynamics of the games we play with language, and why asking someone up to your apartment for coffee is more likely to get you laid than asking someone up to your apartment for sex. This is cognitive psychology at its finest.

(via Notion’s Capital)

0

Ill-advised Humour Warning

Would someone who was actually “free” from gayness be begging this hard to be rear-ended? Just saying.

0

This is Nifty

If you are ever lost in a canoe in the Pacific Northwest, this is the map for you (click image to enlarge):

(via Kottke)

0

The Insufficient Impracticality of David Foster Wallace, Pt. 2

All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age by Hubert Dreyfus and Sean Dorrance Kelly, Free Press, 256 pp., $26.00 (C$29.99)

***

I ended the last installment of this review on a cliff-hanger: Are Dreyfus and Kelly just taking us one step closer to terminal nihilism? If so, do we have to take the step with them? In other words, are we fucked?

Don’t worry. I will get to these questions. These questions will have answers by the end of this review. But why keep you in the dark? Life’s about the journey, right? What good is it to distract you from enjoying the ride with unnecessary suspense about the destination?

So what is our destination? The destination I’m going to try to steer us to is this: To a point, I think Wallace, Dreyfus and Kelly are right, and that we’re in pretty deep shit. But, I think that DFW did make a critical mistake, the recognition of which might have stopped him short of the cliff’s edge. This mistake isn’t quite the one that Dreyfus and Kelly propose (though they take us part way there in proposing it). In fact, in their haste to get out of his head, I think they miss a pivotal DFW insight, an error on their part that places understanding his real mistake (and how to avoid it) beyond the horizon of their discussion.

Ambitious, right? I know. And it’s stressing me out. You’re probably thinking, man, I hope this fool has some ace up his sleeve; one hell of a fucking ace. Well that’s neither here nor there. But before I talk myself out of even trying, let’s buckle our seat belts and get out of the driveway. Driving is believing. Zoom zoom zoom.

***

Read the rest of this entry »

0

BREAKING!!! Donald Rumsfeld was Bad at His Job!

Holy mother of God, this is embarrassing on all sorts of levels. “We also need to solve the Pakistan problem”? Whoops! GUESS THEY NEVER GOT AROUND TO THAT BULLET POINT, DID THEY?! “Korea doesn’t seem to be going well”? Are you serious? Does the Secretary of Defense really get paid for this kind of nuanced analysis? Because there are TEENAGERS in this country who need JOBS!

(via Sullivan)

0

New York Times Mistakes Report of Fewer Teenagers Blogging for Bad News

So this weekend the NYT found some high school senior who stopped blogging because nobody read his shitty, shitty blog, and BOOM! BANG! That’s a news story, amirite?

“I don’t use my blog anymore,” said Mr. McDonald, who lives in San Francisco. “All the people I’m trying to reach are on Facebook.”

First of all, “Mr.” McDonald (WTF? We give honorifics to high school students now?), you can’t put your Facebook profile on your resume. (HELLLLOO, New York Magazine! You haven’t gotten back to me yet! Don’t worry, though, I am STILL AVAILABLE!) Second of all, unless you are stupid, the only people who can read your Facebook posts are your “friends” (HELLLLOO, Facebook friends! Of course we are “friends” in real life!), which rather artificially limits your audience. Third of all, the Times story casts what any thinking person would call “very good news for humanity” as some sort of death knell for our wonderful medium:

[F]rom 2006 to 2009, blogging among children ages 12 to 17 fell by half; now 14 percent of children those ages who use the Internet have blogs.

This is a good thing, New York Times. It is G-O-O-D! It means that there are HALF AS MANY Bieber fan sites today than there would have been if he had been created in 2006! Can we not acknowledge that half as many tween Bieber blogs is excellent news for our country? Would that be unobjective? I do not believe it would!

Anyway, among the people who matter (i.e., voters, alcoholics), blogging hasn’t really died at all, as the Times kinda-sorta-reluctantly admits:

Among 18-to-33-year-olds, the project said in a report last year, blogging dropped two percentage points in 2010 from two years earlier

[...]

Among 34-to-45-year-olds who use the Internet, the percentage who blog increased six points, to 16 percent, in 2010 from two years earlier, the Pew survey found. Blogging by 46-to-55-year-olds increased five percentage points, to 11 percent, while blogging among 65-to-73-year-olds rose two percentage points, to 8 percent.

So, smarter people are blogging more, Bieber fans are blogging less, and the Times has the gumption to call its story “Blogs Wane as the Young Drift to Sites Like Twitter“?!? Jesus Christ, New York Times. The story SHOULD be called “BLOGS FLOURISH AS TEENAGERS GET DISTRACTED BY SOMETHING ELSE ON THE INTERNET!”

This is why newspapers are dying.

(Full disclosure: I have a blog.)

(h/t @on_the_media) (via)

Page 151 of 153« First...102030...149150151152153