Women Archive

3

Bother of the Bride: Dieting. Through your nose.

Tube_eater_large

Bride-(who-wants)-to-be-(thinner), Jessica Schnaider, who spent $1,500 for eight days on a feeding tube to make sure her wedding photos — if not her new body — would look good forever. Credit: Barbara Fernandez for The New York Times

Months of winter forcing you to chow down on ‘comfort food’ making you feel like Violet Beauregarde? You’re in luck: the New York Times was kind enough to shine a spotlight on the latest diet trend sweeping the nation (in this case, a nation made up almost solely of prospective brides looking to shed a couple-twenty pounds): nasogastric tubes, which provide a highly controlled daily dose of calories after being inserted through the nostril, down the esophagus, and into the stomach.

Needless to say, this type of weight loss regimen isn’t for everyone — and in some experts’ opinions, shouldn’t be for anyone. As Time reports:

Dr. David Heber, director of the UCLA Risk Factor Obesity Program, says complications can also include aspiration, infection of the lung, kidney failure and erosion of tissues in the nose and throat. “People are taking an unnecessary medical risk by putting in a [feeding] tube,” he says. “To do it for no reason seems to me overly risky. Without medical supervision, if the protein and electrolyte levels are not monitored, it’s not safe.”

Of course, humans have experimented with destructive ways to maintain their figures since people realized they had figures. The ancient Romans would vomit between courses to make room for the next round. William the Conquerer adopted an all-alcohol diet in 1087 after becoming too fat to ride his horse. Unfortunately, he died that same year after supposedly falling off said horse, which gives a whole new meaning to the phrase “crash diet.” Even Lord Byron had some less-than-appealing practices to keep the poet pounds down:

Existing on biscuits and soda water or potatoes drenched in vinegar, he wore woolly layers to sweat off the pounds and measured himself obsessively. Then he binged on huge meals, finishing off with a necessarily large dose of magnesia.

Of course, if they’d existed in his day, I’m sure Byron would have been one of the first to purchase one of the many variations of the Jiggle-a-Tron 5000 that became popular in the early half of last century, especially considering that its main attraction seemed to be how little physical effort its users actually had to exert in order to reap its supposed benefits.

 

That said, it’s hypocritical to pretend that many of today’s high-tech solutions are any better. Take Japan’s 4 in 1 Pressotherapy Slimming Machine, which promises (in its own delightfully poetic way) that

With perfect combination with magicconversion curve & lymph conduction, fat elimination, breach of fat, magnetic skin tension, integrated with weight loss, body beautification, massage, and exercise, four-in-one body beautification instrument transmits 32 different types of myriametric wave signals to strengthen normal electrochemical process of human nerve endings and generate 32 different moving modes of fat in the body of patients so that the fat in different people will be completed decomposed.

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Especially with a feeding tube up my nose.

(Crossposted on Motherboard)

3

Republicans Oppose the Violence Against Women Act Because Mexicans

They’re taking the war on women national, people:

“I favor the Violence Against Women Act and have supported it at various points over the years, but there are matters put on that bill that almost seem to invite opposition,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, who opposed the latest version last month in the Judiciary Committee. “You think that’s possible? You think they might have put things in there we couldn’t support that maybe then they could accuse you of not being supportive of fighting violence against women?”

The legislation would continue existing grant programs to local law enforcement and battered women shelters, but would expand efforts to reach Indian tribes and rural areas. It would increase the availability of free legal assistance to victims of domestic violence, extend the definition of violence against women to include stalking, and provide training for civil and criminal court personnel to deal with families with a history of violence. It would also allow more battered illegal immigrants to claim temporary visas, and would include same-sex couples in programs for domestic violence.

Ruh-roh! Messicans!

I don’t know what they think will happen. Will battered women be the new “anchor babies”? Are Republicans really going to step up this patently ridiculous fight for the right of white, straight bros to tell everyone else how to live? Because if they are, I kind of can’t wait to watch the implosion, and I’m kinda of disgusted with the whole thing.

Sometimes I find the best way to deal with the fact one of our national parties is filled with insane people is to take a step back and pretend that it’s all a big teevee show. Granted, it’s relatively easy for me, as I’m not the target of most of the horrible legislation that’s proposed and passed in the name of the culture wars, but a coping mechanism is a coping mechanism. I’ll take what I can get.

(via Cole)

1

In which a Republican from Virginia whines about not getting laid due to his support for a rapey, medically unnecessary procedure for women who want an abortion

Submitted without comment.

“Trans-V.” SO BRAVE! Okay, that’s my comment. Also, I hope this dude never has sexual intercourse ever again. Also, I hope his wife spermjacks him and makes him pay child support for the rest of his life. Also, I hope authorities discover child pornography on his hard drive. Also, I hope he burns in hell.

(via)

2

Today in American Lady Parts

This picture has been making the rounds on Facebook, from Planned Parenthood:

Planned Parenthood captions: “These are the witnesses testifying on the birth control benefit right now on Capitol Hill. What is wrong with this picture?”

TBogg reminds us of this one, too, from the signing of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act:

Old white Viagra users signing bills on behalf of women’s health. How lovely.

Meanwhile, today in Virginia (via):

Unfortunately, the “fetal personhood” bill wasn’t the only nutty and frightening piece of legislation that Virginia’s House of Delegates passed. Another bill was advanced requiring a woman undergoing an abortion to have a “transvaginal ultrasound” — i.e., to require a doctor to insert a speculum and then an ultrasound probe into a her vagina against her will and reflect that image onscreen. Not only is a bill like this rather rape-y in its forcefulness — and yes, I realize that is a strong statement, and I mean it strongly — but there is no medically necessary reason to do so. And there are no exceptions. Gov. McDonnell has stated his intention to sign the “transvaginal ultrasound” bill if it lands on his desk.

And what’s that “fetal personhood bill” mentioned in the first sentence of that quote? Why, it’s this charming legislation out of Oklahoma, passed by the state Senate this morning. (Edit: no, it’s not, I misread. Yay! There’s another one! But, whatever, no one reads this shitty blog anyway.)

The Oklahoma Senate has overwhelmingly approved an anti-abortion “personhood” bill that declares life begins at conception.

The vote Wednesday upset doctors who fear the proposed law will jeopardize reproductive medicine.

The bill now heads to the House, where it is expected to pass. Republican Gov. Mary Fallin typically won’t comment on pending legislation, but she has described herself as strongly “pro-life.”

What a great day for American women.

Update: Via John Cole, apparently when Teh Womenz take Teh Pill, it gives Teh Menz prostate cancer:

I’ll bet you she didn’t have her children vaccinated. She’s very anti-chemical, after all.

Honestly, how any one could align themselves with a party that has decided that declaring war on women is a politically winning strategy is beyond me. I just hope they all get AIDS.

***

Updated by Trevor: Don’t worry, Sean Hannity made sure that more diverse voices on this subject were heard:

(As usual, The Daily Show nails it.)

1

President Obama Totally Just Owned a Bunch of Old White Catholic Bishops

Watch this video for a bit of backstory to this stupid controversy, and the “compromise” Obama offered.

So a bunch of old, God-fearing, Catholic Bishop virgins wanted to occupy women’s vaginas and allow religious institutions that objected to providing women with contraception to recuse themselves from the obligation, under the Affordable Care Act, to provide it to their employees. The religious right, ever wary of women being given control over their own bodies, threw a temper tantrum and got it on the news. Everyone was talking about it. How would this wedge issue affect Campaign 2012?

Obama basically says in the above video, “Fuck it, you misogynist twits, if you don’t want to provide contraceptive services to your employees, you don’t have to. But guess what? YOUR INSURANCE PROVIDER DOES IF YOU OPT OUT OF THAT REQUIREMENT. NA-NA-NA-NA-NA, FUCK YOU AND GET THE FUCK OUT! THAT’S THE COMPROMISE! DOMINO, MOTHERFUCKER!” Only with less swear words and more eloquence. Also, sadly, no dominoes.

0

Let them die of breast cancer!

The Susan G. Komen Foundation — of breast cancer awareness month and pink ribbons — has decided that, because Planned Parenthood is “being investigated” by some loony out of Florida for spending tax dollars on illegal abortions (lolwhat?), it is no longer a worthy recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants for breast examinations. Which means, yay! More women will die of breast cancer! What a terrific way to carry the banner for breast cancer awareness!

I’m going to assume you realize how heinous this is, and I encourage you to follow TBogg’s advice on the matter, which is:

you can make a donation to Planned Parenthood and request a thank you card be sent to

Karen Handel
Senior VP of Fail
c/o Susan G. Komen Foundation
P.O. Box 650309
Dallas, TX 75265-0309

As one of TBogg’s readers points out, in order to ensure that Handel receives a thank you from Planned Parenthood, make sure that you choose to make an “honorary gifting” rather than a “one time donation” while you’re over at PP’s donation page.

3

Wading into the comments section at Crooked Timber (Or, Happy Roe Day)

Tedra Osell has a piece up at CT about abortion and today (edit: yesterday, it’s 1:00 in the morning) being Roe Day. Anyhow, there’s a lot of weird pushback from the CT commentariat (60 comments in) that I don’t quite understand, but I think the fundamental issue is addressed in Lynne’s comment at 51:

@jack lecou, it is true that someone who believes abortion is no different from homicide will be absolutely, immovably opposed to legalizing abortion. There is no reasoning with such people. They just have to be overruled.

What other anti-choice people seem to miss (and the abortion = murder crowd don’t care about) is the enormity of a law that overrides the sovereignty of people over their own bodies.

I was in a class with the late philosopher George Grant when someone took him up on his anti-abortion stance by saying, IIRC, “If there can be a law forbidding abortion, there could be a law compelling it.” He acknowledged this, as the point was the reach of the law.

I can’t think of any equivalent situation that faces men, where the law can reach into their bodies and say “Yes, do this,” or “No, you can’t.” I do wish that more men would consider this violation when they are expressing their opinions on abortion—-some men here have, some seem oblivious to the unique scope of abortion law.

And this is it exactly, the bolded part. Fuck your faux-moral concerns about the “sanctity of life” and so on. Until a legal regime is established wherein men are forbidden to masturbate due to the “spermicidal genocide” inherent in the process, we frankly have absolutely no right to decree what women should or shouldn’t be able to do with their own bodies, up to and including killing the organism growing inside of them.

I, for one, have always been pretty comfortable with the idea that one assumes personhood either upon birth, or within a week or two prior to birth. If the mother’s death would result in the fetus’s death without modern medical intervention, the fetus doesn’t have any rights over and above those of the woman carrying it. This is why the famous violinist analogy that’s trotted out repeatedly in defense of abortion in Ethics 101 classes has never quite worked for me: it implies personhood where none should exist. It takes raw biological potential to be social potential. And it gives further ammunition to those who wish to assume that a woman shouldn’t have control over her own body if she’s about to bear the next Mozart, or Picasso, or whoever. Fuck that utilitarian hogwash. It shouldn’t matter whether a woman is about to give birth to a genius or a crackhead. That’s not what the debate is fundamentally about. In fact, A Defense of Abortion concedes a good deal of the argument to the other side from the get-go, regardless of its intentions.

Maybe that’s all you could ask for in 1971. I’m certainly not trying to demonize Thomson. She created a discussion, which is more important than anything I’ve ever done. But I’m not going to pretend that I don’t resent people using her argument as the de facto position on abortion for pro-choice people. It’s not. For me, it’s what’s bolded above. It’s the lingering fascism behind attempts to legislate what people may or may not do with their own bodies for the purposes of their own mental and physical health. It’s the fact that any attempt to limit the scope of a woman’s right to choose implicitly acknowledges the legitimacy of forcing her to do the opposite of what your current moral code dictates. The leap from decreeing “women must not have abortions” to “women must have abortions” isn’t far, after all, if you live in a society where men call most of the shots.

Happy Roe Day.

3

Seriously?

In what can only be called an astounding move by an Administration that pledged on inauguration day that medical and health decisions would be based on fact not ideology and for which women are a major constituency, today Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) overruled a much-awaited decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make emergency contraception (EC) available over-the-counter (OTC) to women of all ages.

Terrible policy from Obama and Sebelius, and for what? The general? Is anyone under the impression that either Newt Gingrich —  a serial philanderer on wife number three — or Mitt Romney — a guy who strapped a dog to his car roof en route to a family vacation — is going to be able to credibly claim some sort of moral high ground in the upcoming election?

Fuck it, I guess if the demographic getting screwed doesn’t vote in high enough numbers, all’s fair in the culture wars. All the more so when it’s election season.

(via Digby)

2

A fully equipped gynecological operating theater has been discovered underneath Tripoli’s Fateh University

Highly disturbing news from BBC Africa:

A fully equipped gynaecological operating theatre, bedroom and jacuzzi have been discovered underneath Tripoli’s Fateh University.

The rooms were discovered beneath the Green Theatre which was used to teach about the revolution and the Green Book which contained Col Muammar Gaddafi’s thoughts and solutions to the country’s social, political and economic problems.

From The Daily Beast: "Tripoli University Dean Faisal Krekshi shows the press gynecological equipment in an examination room at the school., Credit: Babak Dehghanpisheh"

 
Yikes. Just…yikes.

0

Kansas Hates Women

Via Digby, this charming news out of the nation’s wasteland heartland:

It’s official. Every abortion provider in the state of Kansas has been denied a license to continue operating as of July 1. As we reported last week, strict new state laws put in place this month threatened to close the remaining three abortion clinics in Kansas. The staff of one of these facilities, a Planned Parenthood clinic in Overland Park, initially thought their operation could survive the strict new standards. But on Thursday afternoon, Planned Parenthood announced that the Overland Park clinic has thus far been denied a license to continue operating—effectively cutting off access to legal abortion in the entire state.

The new law, which takes effect Friday, establishes new standards for abortion providers—standards apparently designed to make compliance difficult. The rules require changes to the size and number of rooms, compel clinics to have additional supplies on hand, and even mandate room temperatures for the facilities. Given that the rules were released less than two weeks before clinics were expected to be in compliance, many providers knew they wouldn’t be able to obtain a license to continue operating. The laws, often called “targeted regulation of abortion providers,” or TRAP laws, are an increasingly common legislative maneuver to limit access to abortion by rendering it tough, if not impossible, for providers to comply.

Let’s just go back to the nineteenth century, already. You know, when men were men, abortions were carried out with broomsticks in haylofts, and women knew their place.

Everything is endlessly horrifying.

UPDATE BY RED-FACED TOM, WHO REALIZES THAT HE SHOULD CHECK THESE THINGS THE FIRST TIME, BUT GOSHDARNIT, SOMETIMES YOU’RE JUST TOO EAGER TO BLOG TO GET THE FACTS STRAIGHT:

This is from June 30th. Planned Parenthood was allowed to remain open, as were the other two abortion providers, courtesy a federal judge in Kansas City. Phew.

That said, everyone in Kansas except for this one judge hates women. FACT! You can’t explain that.

Page 1 of 212